TV
Skip (8)
Tucker on Free Speech
Apr 05, 2022
13.13k views
Logo

Andrew Torba ✝️

I am a Christian, a husband, a father, a patriotic American, and the CEO of @gab. Now faith is...

episodes
179
plays
1.94m
subscribers
9.86k

Description

Tucker Carlson monologuing on free speech.

You must have a Gab account and be logged in to comment.
  • Wait a minute. Musk wants a chip in every brain, and he also wants to fill the sky with satellites beaming signals to every square inch of the Earth. Hmm... brain chips and signals from space... sounds like the makings of a control grid to me.

  • LOL I have to disagree on my behalf, I dumped twitter looooong ago ha ha But I hope people wake up.

  • Makes 💵$340 to 💵$680 per day online work and I received $45894 in one month online acting from home. I am a daily student and work simply one to a pair of hours in my spare time. Everybody will do that job and online ask extra cash by simply open this link HERE↠↠↠☛☛☛ http://Www.NETCASH1.Com

  • There is no free speech, and even if there was nobody knows what they are talking about! MSM is lies, the truth on what is going on is so secretive nobody knows! Life is too damn short to consume your brains with all the nonsense they are feeding you,, the only way to find happiness is tying yourself out of the political bill shot and live your life!

  • Repeat the same lie over and over until it's believed to be fact without question. The thing I question is Elon Musk's family past being into Technocracy, I don't think that's a bad thing to pick the most qualified person, but this is where he seems different, because he asked for peoples input on issues. Also the fact that he has the largest manufacturing plant in china, which is controlled by the CCP using technology and is not for freedom but world domination, confuses meh. ¯_(ツ)_/¯

  • Homos love Tucker and Fox Jews.

  • At a speech to the WEF Elon stated that a world govt is needed to fix the climate crisis. He will moderate that when hes talking to people who dont think the crisis exists. He has also tweeted that the jab is necessary to fight covid and that the science is "unequivocal". He had a lottery at Tesla and gave 10,000 dollars to the winning employees after they were jabbed. Hes a globalist cunt, whether you accept that fact or not. There are plenty of other reasons and facts that prove what a pos he is but i'll leave them for you to find out for yourselves

  • Baby steps, slow but sure free speech returns.

  • A small win is still a win, a little good news is still good news.

  • The Rebel Billionaire. Love Him!

  • GAWD, I can't stand this fucktard. He will say whatever he is told to say. Fucker Carlson is even worse than all others of MSMs! These creatures are NOT REAL JOURNALISTS, they're just VERY high paid parrots. You don't think they pay these creatures millions and millions and still more millions of dollars a year... to tell the truth, do you? Sheeesh!

  • Musk is the darling Oligarch of The Cabal. His buy up of Twitter is not for "free speech". It is a Jew OLIGARCH taking control of the most prominent platform in social media. Before writing off those who would call him racist, survey Tesla to see if he is or not. Because his family only left SOUTH AFRICA after the APARTHEID REGIME was overthrown. His fortunate was made on American taxpayers SUBSIDIZING Obama era "green tech" for his TOXIC BATTERY vehicles that rape the earth for minerals and consume 8-10 years of a gas fuel vehicle, just to produce the BATTERY. Buyer — specially goyim — beware!

  • Is there yet another angle to Elon Musk staking an active claim in Twitter? Keep in mind that Musk is a graduate of Klaus Schwab's program that gave us such luminaries as Gavin Newsome, Justin Trudeau, Pete Buttigieg, Jeff Bezos, and Bill Gates.

  • Gab - making the internet fun again

  • It is too bad Tucker doesn't publicize Gab as a free speech platform. #Gab #1A

  • Very true.

    Yet another example of the harm that granting censors immunity can cause. The problem is legal and the solution is to remove the immunity granted by Section 230.

    Here is the offensive section (link below) that provides them immunity for their censorship, and note the "whether or not such material is constitutionally protected" part:

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230

    (c)Protection for “Good Samaritan” blocking and screening of offensive material (1)Treatment of publisher or speaker No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.

    (2)Civil liability No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be held liable on account of— (A)any action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected; or (B)any action taken to enable or make available to information content providers or others the technical means to restrict access to material described in paragraph (1).[1]

    #1A #RemoveSection230 #DeleteTwitter #DeleteGoogle #DeleteFacebook #DeleteYoutube

  • Very true.

    Yet another example of the harm that granting censors immunity can cause. The problem is legal and the solution is to remove the immunity granted by Section 230.

    Here is the offensive section (link below) that provides them immunity for their censorship, and note the "whether or not such material is constitutionally protected" part:

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230

    (c)Protection for “Good Samaritan” blocking and screening of offensive material (1)Treatment of publisher or speaker No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.

    (2)Civil liability No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be held liable on account of— (A)any action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected; or (B)any action taken to enable or make available to information content providers or others the technical means to restrict access to material described in paragraph (1).[1]

    #1A #RemoveSection230 #DeleteTwitter #DeleteGoogle #DeleteFacebook #DeleteYoutube

  • Our Jewish savior?🙄 Beware.

  • I don't trust Elon ... this is a man who wants to put a chip in EVERYONE'S head but not his ... and his mom belongs to the illuminati cult , so what does that make Elon .. a scary genius or just evil .

Modal title